ANALYSIS OF THE SPRINGFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT INCIDENT AND CRIME REPORT DISCLOSURE

INTRODUCTION

On Thursday, March 13th, 2025, the Springfield Police Department (SPD) in Ohio detained two Black individuals, an event that has drawn public concern . This incident occurred within a societal context where policing practices are increasingly subject to scrutiny due to the widespread availability of body-worn cameras, social media platforms, and personal cell phones capable of recording interactions. Simultaneously, the Springfield Domestic Violence Coalition (SDVC) has been engaged in advocacy for nearly two years, requesting the disclosure of annual crime reports from the SPD. This request, aimed at obtaining comprehensive data on criminal activity within the city, has been met with resistance, as the City of Springfield's legal department has stated that there are no legal grounds to provide such reports to the public. This report will analyze the events of the March 13th detention, examine the role of contemporary transparency mechanisms in such incidents, contextualize the police interaction with statistical data on non-compliance during police stops, and critically evaluate the legal basis for the City of Springfield's refusal to disclose annual crime reports to the SDVC. The analysis will also consider the significance of crime data for organizations like the SDVC in their efforts to address domestic violence and promote community safety.

THE MARCH 13TH, 2025 INCIDENT, INITIAL REPORT AND 911 CALL

The sequence of events leading to the detention of the two individuals began with a 911 call reporting that two individuals were pointing a gun at passing vehicles in the 600 block of East High Street, near York. The caller provided descriptions of the two people, stating that one was wearing a gray “jumpsuit” while the other was wearing a black top and shorts. This initial report, obtained through public records, formed the basis for the Springfield Police Division's response to the scene . The information relayed by the 911 caller, including the alleged firearm and the descriptions of the individuals, immediately framed the situation as a potentially high-risk encounter for responding officers. Upon arrival at the location, police officers in a cruiser were captured on footage telling the two individuals to stop walking . An officer then approached them and promptly issued a command to the person wearing a gray sweatsuit to "get your hand out of your [expletive] pants, now" . This immediate and forceful directive was met with protest from the individual, who questioned the officer's actions by asking, "what are you on?" . When the other individual, wearing a black sweatshirt, indicated his desire to take a photograph of the officer's badge, the officer responded dismissively, stating, "you don't need to worry about it" . The individual in the gray sweatsuit was subsequently handcuffed after repeatedly protesting the interaction . Body camera footage from the incident revealed an officer stating that they had not observed either person discarding any items before the police approached them . Throughout the initial phase of the encounter, police repeatedly asked the individual in gray for his name .

The individual in the gray sweatsuit consistently denied possessing a gun and suggested that officers search his bag. He eventually provided his name and was released at the scene, indicating his intention to file a formal complaint against the officers . The individual wearing black also protested the interaction, stating that both he and his companion were being "illegally detained" . He refused to identify himself, asserting that he was not legally obligated to do so . An officer disagreed with this assertion, stating that the individual was obstructing the investigation. Consequently, the individual in black was detained in a cruiser and subsequently charged with failure to identify, resisting arrest, and obstructing official business . Following the incident, the Springfield Police Division issued a statement acknowledging the public concerns that had arisen, particularly after footage of the detention was shared online, leading some residents to question whether racial profiling was a factor . The police department stated that they were conducting a "thorough review" of the incident to ensure all facts were gathered and to maintain accuracy and transparency . They emphasized that while social media videos provided a partial view of the encounter, they did not capture the entirety of the event or the potential dangers officers believed they faced, given the initial report of a firearm-related threat .

THE LANDSCAPE OF POLICE TRANSPARENCY IN 2025; BODY-WORN CAMERAS (BWCS)

In 2025, body-worn cameras (BWCs) will become an increasingly common and expected tool for enhancing transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Advocates for BWCs highlight their potential to aid in officer training by allowing for post-incident review of performance, provide the public with greater insight into police actions, protect officers from false accusations by offering a documented record of events, and enhance the collection of evidence for arrests and prosecutions . Studies have indicated that the use of BWCs can lead to a reduction in the number of use-of-force reports and citizen complaints against officers . However, it is also important to acknowledge the potential limitations of BWC footage. The perspective captured by a camera lens may differ from an officer's actual perception during a dynamic and stressful encounter, and the interpretation of video evidence often requires careful consideration of context and human factors that influence decision-making . In the case of the Springfield incident, SPD policies regarding body-worn cameras were appropriately followed, with all interactions recorded with volume, and that the department believes there was no travesty or miscarriage of justice. While BWC footage provides a valuable visual record, the extent to which it ensures true transparency hinges on the policies governing its accessibility, review processes, and the degree to which both internal and external stakeholders can engage with this footage to understand the full context of events. Beyond official body-worn camera footage, social media platforms and the prevalence of cell phone recordings have significantly altered the landscape of police transparency in 2025. These readily available technologies empower individuals to document police encounters, share their perspectives in real-time, and contribute to a broader public discourse on law enforcement practices . Social media can act as a powerful tool for public oversight, allowing for candid assessments of police performance and providing a platform for individuals to share their experiences, both positive and negative . The rapid dissemination of information through these channels can quickly shape public opinion and increase vigilance towards police actions . However, this increased scrutiny can also present challenges for officers, who may feel unjustly judged based on partial or out-of-context video clips shared online . In the Springfield incident, the fact that footage taken by one of the detained individuals was posted online and led to questions about racial profiling underscores the significant role of citizen recordings in shaping public perception and prompting official responses . The balance between the benefits of increased transparency through social media and the potential for misinterpretation or the spread of incomplete narratives remains a critical consideration in the contemporary policing environment .

CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT

Civilian oversight agencies (COAs) represent another mechanism designed to enhance police accountability and foster public trust . These independent bodies can play a crucial role in reviewing police conduct, investigating complaints from the public, and recommending policy changes or disciplinary actions . Research suggests that the presence of COAs can contribute to a reduction in racial disparities in policing outcomes and an overall decrease in police homicides . By providing an external review process, COAs can increase the perceived legitimacy of police departments and demonstrate a commitment to holding officers accountable for their actions . The structure and authority of COAs can vary significantly, with some agencies having the power to conduct inde.pendent investigations and others primarily focusing on reviewing the findings of internal police inquiries . The effectiveness of a COA often depends on factors such as its independence, access to information, and the willingness of police leadership to implement its recommendations. NOTE: The City of Springfield established an independent Community Police Advisory Team (CAPT). The team is made up of nine community members appointed to study matters affecting and concerning the relationship between the Springfield Police Division (SPD) and members of the community. The official City of Springfield organization does not produce reports, meeting agendas, or public records. The organization does not publish meeting recommendations or a list of CAPT concerns regarding crime and law enforcement. Furthermore, this organization has no term limits or new member elections.

Clearly the City of Springfield has an active BUT not effective civilian oversight mechanism which can not significantly influence public confidence in the thoroughness and impartiality of the review promised by the SPD regarding the March 13th incident.

UNDERSTANDING NON-COMPLIANCE IN POLICE INTERACTIONS, COMMON NON-COMPLIANCE BEHAVIORS

Statistical data from a survey of over 1,000 police officers provides insights into the prevalence of non-compliance during traffic stops . The most common non-compliant behavior reported by officers was the failure to follow commands, cited by 42% of respondents. This was followed by a failure to answer questions, which accounted for 24% of non-compliance instances, and a refusal to show a driver's license and other documents, reported at 10%.

Non-Compliance Behavior Percentage

Failure to follow commands 42%

Failure to answer questions 24%

Refusal to show driver's license etc. 10%

The prevalence of "failure to follow commands" as the most common form of non-compliance suggests a complex interplay between police directives and civilian responses. It is possible that in some instances, individuals may not understand the commands, may be fearful or confused, or may perceive the commands as unlawful or unjustified, leading to a reluctance or inability to comply immediately. This highlights the importance of clear communication and de-escalation techniques by law enforcement officers to ensure understanding and encourage cooperation. The same survey data indicates that the types of traffic stops most likely to result in non-compliance are those involving suspicion of criminal intent, reported by 76% of officers, and impaired driving, cited by 66%. The Springfield incident originated from a 911 call reporting a firearm-related threat, which would likely fall under the category of "suspicion of criminal intent." This context is crucial because it statistically places the encounter within a higher-risk category for potential non-compliance compared to routine traffic stops for minor infractions. The officers' heightened level of caution and the more assertive approach observed in the initial moments of the interaction with the two individuals could be partly attributed to the nature of the reported threat and the statistical likelihood of encountering resistance in such situations.

FACTORS INFLUENCING COMPLIANCE

Whether individuals perceive the law as legitimate and hold trust in legal institutions significantly impacts their behavior during interactions with police officers. Also noteworthy is that civilians ultimately decide how they will behave towards police, and officers simultaneously make choices about how they will exercise their authority. Following the decision to intervene, officers' subsequent actions and choices, ranging from issuing a verbal warning to using deadly force, can either foster cooperation or escalate tensions. Research suggests that positive officer demeanor and the use of non-coercive verbal tactics are associated with a higher likelihood of suspect compliance . Conversely, accusatory language or displays of aggression can increase the likelihood of resistance. The initial interaction in the Springfield incident, with the officer's immediate and forceful command, could be interpreted as an exercise of authority that may not have prioritized de-escalation and could have contributed to the subsequent protests and lack of cooperation from the detained individuals. Studies examining resistance towards police during traffic stops and other encounters have revealed nuanced findings . One study indicated that non-White suspects were more likely to exhibit non-compliant behavior towards White officers, although not necessarily more aggressive forms of resistance such as verbal or physical aggression . This suggests that factors beyond overt aggression, such as a lack of trust or perceived unfair treatment, might contribute to non-compliance in certain demographic groups. Other research has explored the impact of officer communication tactics on suspect compliance, finding that a positive officer demeanor and the use of non-coercive language significantly increase the likelihood of cooperation . The narrative surrounding traffic stops often emphasizes the potential danger to police officers; however, research also indicates that violence against officers during routine traffic stops is relatively rare . The Springfield incident, involving the detention of two Black individuals by police responding to a report of a firearm, highlights the complexities of these interactions and the importance of considering both officer safety and the rights and perceptions of civilians.

THE SPRINGFIELD DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COALITION'S PURSUIT OF TRANSPARENCY; ADVOCACY FOR CRIME REPORT DISCLOSURE

The Springfield Domestic Violence Coalition (SDVC) has been actively advocating for nearly two years for the Springfield Police Department (SPD) to disclose annual crime reports, making a clear distinction from "calls for service" reports. Crime reports, in the context of law enforcement, typically refer to official records documenting reported criminal offenses, often compiled using standardized systems like the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program or the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) . These reports contain detailed information about the nature of the crime, victims, suspects (if known), and other relevant details . In contrast, "calls for service" reports are logs that record each instance when someone contacts the police for assistance, which can include a wide array of situations that may not necessarily involve a criminal offense . For example, a "call for service" might be for a noise complaint, a domestic dispute that does not result in an arrest, or a report of suspicious activity that is later deemed non-criminal . The SDVC's specific request for crime reports indicates their need for verified data on criminal activity within Springfield, likely to better understand the prevalence and nature of crimes relevant to their mission, such as domestic violence, sexual assault, and related offenses. Despite the SDVC's persistent advocacy, the City of Springfield has not produced the requested annual crime reports. The city's legal department has reportedly cited that there are no legal grounds to provide these reports to the public. In response to this lack of official data, the SDVC took the initiative to create their own "Unofficial Springfield Police Departments Annual Report 2023," which they compiled based on arrest data . The SDVC has publicly challenged the City of Springfield to either confirm or deny the accuracy of their unofficial report. This situation underscores a significant disconnect between the information needs of a community organization focused on public safety and the data being made available by the city's law enforcement agency. The city's refusal to provide annual crime reports, coupled with the SDVC's independent efforts to gather and disseminate crime-related information, suggests a potential lack of transparency and a disagreement regarding the scope of publicly accessible law enforcement data.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR PUBLIC RECORDS DISCLOSURE IN OHIO; OHIO PUBLIC RECORDS LAW (OHIO REVISED CODE § 149.43)

The disclosure of government records in Ohio is governed by the Ohio Public Records Law, codified in Ohio Revised Code § 149.43, often referred to as the "Sunshine Laws" . This law establishes the fundamental principle that public records are the people's records and should be readily accessible to the public . It mandates that all public offices, including city units like the Springfield Police Department, must maintain their records in an organized manner to facilitate their availability for inspection and copying . The law imposes two primary obligations on public offices: to provide prompt inspection of public records during regular business hours and to furnish copies of these records within a reasonable timeframe upon request . The Ohio Public Records Act is broadly interpreted by courts in favor of disclosure, meaning that the default position is one of openness, and any exceptions to this rule are narrowly construed . The definition of a "public record" under Ohio law is expansive, encompassing any records kept by a public office that document the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the office, regardless of their physical format. While Ohio law generally promotes the accessibility of public records, it also recognizes that certain types of information may be exempt from disclosure. Ohio Revised Code § 149.43(A) outlines specific exceptions, including, but not limited to, medical records, trial preparation records, and confidential law enforcement investigatory records (CLEIR) . The CLEIR exemption is particularly relevant in the context of police records and typically applies to information compiled as part of an ongoing investigation where disclosure could compromise the investigation by revealing the identity of uncharged suspects, confidential sources, specific investigatory techniques, or work product, or endanger life or physical safety . However, it's important to note that these exemptions are generally applied narrowly, and the burden of proving that a record falls under a specific exemption rests with the public office seeking to withhold it . Furthermore, if only a portion of a record is exempt, the public office is generally required to redact the exempt information and release the non-exempt portions. Within the realm of law enforcement, Ohio law distinguishes between different types of records regarding their accessibility . Routine offense and incident reports, which document the initial details of reported crimes, are generally considered public records and are typically not subject to the CLEIR exemption, especially once an investigation has concluded or reached a certain stage . Similarly, statistical summaries and annual reports that aggregate crime data without revealing specific confidential details about ongoing investigations or the identities of individuals are often considered disclosable under the Ohio Public Records Act . The requirement to redact exempt information rather than withhold entire documents further supports the principle of maximum possible disclosure . Therefore, the City of Springfield's assertion of "no legal grounds" to provide annual crime reports to the public warrants closer examination in light of these general principles and the specific exemptions outlined in Ohio law.

ANALYZING THE SPRINGFIELD’S LEGAL JUSTIFICATION FOR WITHHOLDING CRIME REPORTS; EVALUATING THE "NO LEGAL GROUNDS" CLAIM

The City of Springfield’s legal department's claim that there are "no legal grounds" to provide annual crime reports to the public is a broad assertion that appears to contradict the general principles of Ohio's Public Records Law. Given that Ohio law mandates broad access to public records and narrowly construes exemptions, the city would need to articulate a specific legal basis for withholding annual summaries or statistical reports of crime data. It is possible that the city's legal department is relying on a specific exemption, such as the CLEIR exemption, but the applicability of this exemption to aggregated annual crime data, especially data that does not contain specific details of ongoing investigations or personal identifying information, is questionable .

Reply to SDVC request for Annual Crime Reports: As per Randy Stevenson, Assistant Law Director, City of Springfield:

Please note: “The demographic categories you outline in your request are not tracked by the City. Under Ohio Revised Code § 149.43(B)(1), public offices are required to make available only existing records, and there is no obligation to create or compile a record to satisfy a request (State ex rel. Fant v. Enright, 66 Ohio St. 3d 186, 1993).”

The SDVC response addresses the objection raised concerning the availability of demographic information, citing Ohio Revised Code § 149.43(B)(1) and the City's alleged lack of tracking such categories. While we (SDVC) acknowledge the legal framework regarding existing records, we contend that the spirit of transparency and public accountability necessitates the provision of relevant demographic data, particularly in matters of public safety and resource allocation. We draw your attention to Police Chief Elliot's public statement at the City Commissioners Meeting on August 29, 2023. During this meeting, Chief Elliot explicitly acknowledged the public's "citizen's right to know some of these answers, not just within a specific demographic that we’re speaking about right now in our community." She further stated, "I’ll do everything I can to gather my stats and make sure I have the right stats to speak on for you, if we wanna have a conversation about it, and sit down and talk about it, I’d be more than happy to break down those demographics. "Chief Elliot's statement establishes a clear precedent for the availability and disclosure of demographic information. Her willingness to "gather" and "break down" these statistics strongly implies that such data is, in fact, collected or can be compiled. Furthermore, she encouraged the public to "make public records requests" for such information, which contradicts the assertion that these categories are not tracked. We understand the legal argument regarding the obligation to provide only existing records. However, the Chief's public commitment to providing demographic information creates a reasonable expectation that such data is accessible. To deny this information based solely on the argument that the City does not "track" it in a specific format undermines the Chief's commitment to public transparency and the public's right to know. Furthermore, Domestic Violence arrests and incidents in which the Springfield Police Department provided to the Ohio Attorney General’s Office of Domestic Violence Reports by The Ohio Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation contains a detailed breakdown of gender and race/ethnicity of those arrested and those involved in incidents since 2010. Therefore, without a clearly articulated legal justification citing a specific provision of the Ohio Revised Code or relevant case law, the city's refusal appears to undermine the spirit of transparency and public access that the Public Records Law aims to uphold. While the city has not provided a specific legal rationale, it is conceivable that they might attempt to argue that annual crime reports fall under an exemption. One potential argument could be that these reports contain information that, if released, could compromise ongoing investigations. However, this argument is often countered by the fact that aggregate annual data can typically be presented in a manner that does not reveal sensitive details about specific cases that are still under investigation . Another potential argument might be that compiling an annual crime report constitutes the creation of a new record, which public offices are generally not obligated to do . However, if the SPD already tracks and utilizes this crime data internally for analysis, strategic planning, and reporting to state or federal agencies (such as through the UCR or NIBRS systems), then generating a summary for public disclosure should not necessarily be considered an undue burden or the creation of an entirely new record . A further argument could be made concerning the privacy of victims. However, annual statistical reports can be designed to present data in an anonymized and aggregated format that does not disclose the identities of individual victims . In the absence of a specific and compelling legal justification, the refusal to provide annual crime statistics raises concerns about the city's commitment to transparency and its willingness to share information that is vital for public understanding and community safety initiatives.

THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN CRIME REPORTS AND CALLS FOR SERVICE REVISITED

The Springfield Domestic Violence Coalition's specific request for crime reports as opposed to "calls for service" data is critical. As previously discussed, "calls for service" represent a broader category of police responses that may not always result in a formal crime report . For an organization like the SDVC, which focuses on preventing domestic violence and supporting victims, access to official crime reports is essential for understanding the actual incidence and trends of domestic violence and related crimes within Springfield . Providing only "calls for service" data would offer an incomplete and potentially misleading picture of the problem. For instance, a high volume of domestic disturbance calls might not accurately reflect the number of cases that are officially reported as domestic violence crimes, either due to victims' reluctance to press charges, lack of sufficient evidence for an arrest, or other factors . Therefore, the city's apparent reliance on providing "calls for service" data (as suggested by the SDVC's specific request for crime reports) while withholding annual crime reports hinders the SDVC's ability to accurately assess the scope of domestic violence in Springfield and to effectively advocate for prevention and support services. Access to annual crime reports, particularly those detailing incidents of domestic violence, is of paramount importance for organizations like the Springfield Domestic Violence Coalition (SDVC). This data allows the SDVC to identify critical trends, geographical hotspots where domestic violence is more prevalent, and recurring patterns in the nature and severity of abuse within the Springfield community . By analyzing this information over time, the SDVC can gain a deeper understanding of the dynamics of domestic violence in their locality, which is essential for developing targeted and effective prevention strategies. For example, identifying areas with a high incidence of reported domestic violence could inform decisions about where to focus outreach efforts or establish support services. Recognizing patterns in the types of weapons used or the times of day when incidents are most likely to occur can help tailor safety education campaigns and inform law enforcement responses. Comprehensive crime data provides the evidence base necessary for a more informed and strategic approach to combating domestic violence. The availability of detailed crime statistics also plays a crucial role in the SDVC's ability to allocate their resources effectively and advocate for necessary policy changes and increased support . When seeking funding from grant-making organizations or government agencies, the SDVC can use concrete crime data to demonstrate the extent of the problem in Springfield and justify their need for financial support to expand their services, such as emergency shelters, counseling programs, and legal aid. Similarly, when advocating for policy changes at the local or state level, such as stricter enforcement of domestic violence laws or increased funding for victim support, the SDVC can leverage crime statistics to underscore the urgency and importance of these initiatives. Presenting data on the number of reported domestic violence incidents, the rates of recidivism among offenders, or the challenges faced by victims in accessing justice can provide compelling evidence to policymakers and community leaders, strengthening the SDVC's arguments for change. Publicly available crime statistics empower organizations to make data-driven arguments that carry greater weight and influence with stakeholders.

BUILDING COMMUNITY TRUST AND TRANSPARENCY

The disclosure of crime data by the Springfield Police Department would also contribute to greater transparency and help build trust between law enforcement and the community, particularly concerning the sensitive issue of domestic violence . When the police department is open about the challenges and trends in crime, including domestic violence, it demonstrates a commitment to addressing these issues and allows for more informed public discourse . Sharing this data can help the community understand the scope of the problem and foster a sense of shared responsibility in finding solutions. Furthermore, transparency regarding crime statistics can increase public confidence in the police department's efforts to combat crime and support victims. When community members have access to this information, they can better assess the effectiveness of law enforcement strategies and engage in constructive dialogue about public safety concerns. This openness can be particularly important in fostering trust with vulnerable populations, such as victims of domestic violence, who may be hesitant to come forward if they perceive a lack of transparency or commitment from law enforcement.

CONCLUSION

The detention of two Black individuals by the Springfield Police Department on March 13th, 2025, occurred within a context of heightened public awareness of police actions due to advancements in technology that promote transparency. While the SPD maintains that their officers followed protocol, the incident underscores the complexities of police interactions, particularly those involving individuals from marginalized communities. Simultaneously, the City of Springfield's refusal to disclose annual crime reports to the Springfield Domestic Violence Coalition (SDVC), citing a lack of legal grounds, appears inconsistent with the general principles of Ohio's Public Records Law, which favors broad public access to government information. The SDVC's need for this data, especially concerning domestic violence, is critical for understanding trends, allocating resources, advocating for policy changes, and fostering community trust. The city's broad claim of "no legal grounds" without specific justification raises concerns about transparency and hinders the efforts of organizations working to address significant public safety issues. It is recommended that the SPD and the City of Springfield reconsider their stance on disclosing annual crime reports, providing a clear legal rationale for any continued withholding. Engaging in a dialogue with the SDVC to understand their specific data needs and exploring ways to provide relevant information, while respecting privacy and legal limitations, would be a positive step towards greater transparency and community collaboration. Reviewing their public records policies to ensure alignment with Ohio's Sunshine Laws and promoting maximum transparency would ultimately benefit both the police department and the citizens of Springfield by fostering greater trust and facilitating more informed approaches to public safety. The situation in Springfield highlights a recurring tension between law enforcement agencies managing information and the public's right to access data for oversight and advocacy, a balance that requires careful consideration to ensure accountability and build stronger community relations.

SOURCES USED IN THE REPORT

springfieldnewssun.com

Springfield police release footage of arrest that sparked racial ...

whio.com

'Thorough review' promised after widely shared video shows Springfield police detaining man - WHIO-TV

rand.org

Stop, Start, or Continue? A National Survey of the Police About ...

police1.com

How non-compliance during traffic stops impacts officer safety

upressonline.com

Social media's effects on policing: Why it matters in an age of ...

brennancenter.org

Principles for Social Media Use by Law Enforcement | Brennan Center for Justice

ojp.gov

Body-Worn Cameras: What the Evidence Tells Us - Office of Justice Programs

axon.com

The pros and cons of police body cams | Axon - Axon.com

newcastle.edu.au

Examining the impact of amateur video and social media on police ...

politico.com

Body-Worn Cameras Build Transparency and Trust for Law Enforcement Across the Nation

springfielddvc.com

Springfield Domestic Violence Coalition | Domestic Violence

researchgate.net

Explaining Suspects' Resistance and Disrespect toward Police - ResearchGate

digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu

Compliance with Police: Does the Interaction of Race/Ethnicity and Sex Matter? - Digital Commons@Georgia Southern

urban.org

How Do People in High-Crime, Low-Income Communities View the Police? | Urban Institute

journals.sagepub.com

When Suspects Resist Arrest: Prevalence, Correlates, and Implications for Front-Line Policing - Kelly A. Hine, Jason L. Payne, Alex R. Piquero, 2021 - Sage Journals

repository.law.umich.edu

"Policing, Danger Narratives, and Routine Traffic Stops" by Jordan Blair Woods

michiganlawreview.org

Policing, Danger Narratives, and Routine Traffic Stops - Michigan Law Review

cosspp.fsu.edu

Improving Police Community Relations: The Role of Civilian Oversight Agencies (COA) in Florida-V1.docx

ojp.gov

Citizen Review of Police : Approaches and Implementation - Office of Justice Programs

leb.fbi.gov

Social Media and Law Enforcement | FBI - LEB

journals.sagepub.com

Use of Performance Information and External Accountability: The Role of Citizen Oversight in Mitigating the Motivated Evaluation of Body-Worn Camera Evidence - Mir Usman Ali, James E. Wright, 2024 - Sage Journals

scholarworks.waldenu.edu

Civilian Oversight of Police Through the Lens of Polarities of Democracy - ScholarWorks | Walden University Research

counciloncj.foleon.com

XI. Civilian Oversight - Assessing the Evidence - Foleon

springfielddvc.com

2024 Springfield Crime Report

springfielddvc.com

All News | SDVC - Springfield Domestic Violence Coalition

umaryland.edu

Calls for Service - University of Maryland, Baltimore

nbpd.org

Calls For Service | Newport Beach Police Department